Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) flowers and fruit. Sadly, I have yet to catch a Virginia creeper in bloom — the flowers are inconspicuous — but have high hopes for this summer. However, I have found plants bearing fruit. Both images here show what had been an inflorescence that is now bearing unripe fruit. (Ripe fruit would be dark blue.) Note that the inflorescence has a distinct central stalk (arrows), a feature not present in Virginia creeper’s close relative, woodbine (Parthenocissus vitacea).
Virginia creeper produces panicles of 80-150 flowers opposite leaf nodes; the panicles are broader than long and have a distinct central axis. Individual flowers are 1/4″ across, green, with five petals, five white stamens with yellow anthers, and a single stout, cone-shaped style. Flowers may have only stamens, only pistils, or both pistils and stamens. The petals have a raised margin (less so than woodbine) and are reflected backwards around the flower stalk. The fruit is a fleshy berry that is initially green but becomes blue-black with maturation; the flower stalks become orange-red or red as the fruit matures. The clusters of the fruit are reminiscent of a bunch of grapes. Opposite the leaf nodes are tendrils with as many as 10 branches; the tendrils end in distinct (adhesive) pads. Virginia creeper plants growing on trees produce aerial roots with a distinct “beard” of rootlets. Woodbine (Parthenocissus vitacea) also has palmate leaves with five leaflets, very similar to Virginia creeper (P. quinquefolia), but lacks the distinctive “bearded” aerial roots with short rootlets that are present in Virginia creeper. Opposite the base of the leaf petiole on the stem, woodbine produces a thin filament that branches 2-3 times, anchoring the vine by twining around objects. In Virginia creeper, the equivalent filaments are stouter, branch up to ten times, and end in robust, egg-shaped pads that attach to the substrate. The inflorescence of woodbine lacks a central axis; the inflorescence of Virginia creeper has a distinct central axis. Wikipedia lists other differences between the two species. Illinois Wildflowers, USDA Plants, and and World Flora Online consider the two species to be one; Minnesota Wildflowers considers them to be separate and distinct. Flora of North America indicates the correct scientific name for woodbine is Parthenocissus vitacea (not P. inserta), as does ITIS and MissouriPlants.com, implying woodbine and Virginia creeper are distinct species. Both woodbine and Virginia creeper have 40 chromosomes. Lu et al.’s (2012, 2023) molecular and morphological analyses indicate that woodbine and Virginia creeper are very closely related but distinct species and I’ll consider that to be correct here.
Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) leaves. Left: leaves attached to a Virginia creeper vine using a tree as a substrate. Right: a single leaf showing the upper side of the leaf in the upper image and the underside of the leaf in the lower image. Note the five asymmetric leaflets.
Virginia creeper is a woody vine that grows over and up trees and fences; it can reach lengths of 60 feet. The leaves are palmately compound with five (sometime 4, rarely 3 or 7) leaflets up to 6″ long and 2.5″ across with coarse serrations along the distal margins; the compound leaf itself has a slender, 6-8″ long petiole. Virginia creeper plants growing on trees produce aerial roots with a distinct “beard” of rootlets. Woodbine (Parthenocissus vitacea) has palmate leaves with five leaflets, very similar to Virginia creeper (P. quinquefolia), but lacks the distinctive “bearded” aerial roots with short rootlets that are present in Virginia creeper. Opposite the base of the leaf petiole on the stem, woodbine produces a thin filament that branches 2-3 times, anchoring the vine by twining around objects. In Virginia creeper, the equivalent filaments are stouter, branch up to ten times, and end in robust, egg-shaped pads that attach to the substrate. The inflorescence of woodbine lacks a central axis; the inflorescence of Virginia creeper has a distinct central axis. Wikipedia lists other differences between the two species. Illinois Wildflowers, USDA Plants, and and World Flora Online consider the two species to be one; Minnesota Wildflowers considers them to be separate and distinct. Flora of North America indicates the correct scientific name for woodbine is Parthenocissus vitacea (not P. inserta), as does ITIS and MissouriPlants.com, implying that woodbine and Virginia creeper are distinct species. Both woodbine and Virginia creeper have 40 chromosomes. Lu et al.’s (2012, 2023) molecular and morphological analyses indicate that woodbine and Virginia creeper are very closely related but distinct species and I’ll consider that to be correct here.
Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) infesting hardwood trees on Wooded Island. Note the five leaflets on each leaf and how high the Virginia creeper has ascended in the tree on the left.
Virginia creeper is a woody vine that grows over and up trees and fences; it can reach lengths of 60 feet. The leaves are palmately compound with five (sometime 4, rarely 3 or 7) leaflets up to 6″ long and 2.5″ across with coarse serrations along the distal margins; the compound leaf itself has a slender, 6-8″ long petiole. Opposite the leaf nodes are tendrils with as many as 10 branches; the tendrils end in distinct (adhesive) pads. Virginia creeper plants growing on trees produce aerial roots with a distinct “beard” of rootlets. Woodbine (Parthenocissus vitacea) also has palmate leaves with five leaflets, very similar to Virginia creeper (P. quinquefolia), but lacks the distinctive “bearded” aerial roots with short rootlets that are present in Virginia creeper. Opposite the base of the leaf petiole on the stem, woodbine produces a thin filament that branches 2-3 times, anchoring the vine by twining around objects. In Virginia creeper, the equivalent filaments are stouter, branch up to ten times, and end in robust, egg-shaped pads that attach to the substrate. The inflorescence of woodbine lacks a central axis; the inflorescence of Virginia creeper has a distinct central axis. Wikipedia lists other differences between the two species. Illinois Wildflowers, USDA Plants, and and World Flora Online consider the two species to be one; Minnesota Wildflowers considers them to be separate and distinct. Flora of North America indicates the correct scientific name for woodbine is Parthenocissus vitacea (not P. inserta), as does ITIS and MissouriPlants.com, implying that woodbine and Virginia creeper are distinct species. Both woodbine and Virginia creeper have 40 chromosomes. Lu et al.’s (2012, 2023) molecular and morphological analyses indicate that woodbine and Virginia creeper are very closely related but are indeed distinct species and I’ll consider that to be correct here.
Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) — distinguishing characters. Two characters that distinguish Virginia creeper from woodbine (Parthenocissus vitacea) are the “bearded’ aerial rootlets (left image) in Virginia creeper and tendrils that arise opposite some leaf nodes with as many as ten branches (right images) that each end in distinct (adhesive) pads (arrows).
Virginia creeper is very similar to woodbine (Parthenocissus vitacea); the two have often been claimed to be the same species. Virginia creeper plants growing on trees produce aerial roots with a distinct “beard” of rootlets. Woodbine (Parthenocissus vitacea) also has palmate leaves with five leaflets, very similar to Virginia creeper (P. quinquefolia), but lacks the distinctive “bearded” aerial roots with short rootlets that are present in Virginia creeper. Opposite the base of the leaf petiole on the stem, woodbine produces a thin filament that branches 2-3 times, anchoring the vine by twining around objects. In Virginia creeper, the equivalent filaments are stouter, branch up to ten times, and end in robust, egg-shaped pads that attach to the substrate. The inflorescence of woodbine lacks a central axis; the inflorescence of Virginia creeper has a distinct central axis. Wikipedia lists other differences between the two species. Illinois Wildflowers, USDA Plants, and World Flora Online consider the two species to be one; Minnesota Wildflowers considers them to be separate and distinct. Flora of North America indicates the correct scientific name for woodbine is Parthenocissus vitacea (not P. inserta), as does ITIS and MissouriPlants.com, implying that woodbine and Virginia creeper are distinct species. Both woodbine and Virginia creeper have 40 chromosomes. Lu et al.’s (2012, 2023) molecular and morphological analyses indicate that woodbine and Virginia creeper are very closely related but are indeed distinct species and I’ll consider that to be correct here.

