Black nightshade is a native annual, a much-branched plant up to three feet tall. Unlike horsenettle (
Solanum carolinense) but like bittersweet nightshade (
Solanum dulcamara) — the other two species of
Solanum in Jackson Park — there are no sharp bristles or spines on the stems or leaves (which are both variably hairy) of black nightshade. The leaves are 3″ long and 2″ across. They are highly variable in shape (lance-shaped to triangular to oval) and dentation (margins smooth, wavy, or bluntly toothed); the petioles are long and always winged near the leaf blade. Solitary umbels 3/4″ long usually arise from the axils of middle and upper leaves; the flower pedicels are about 3/8″ long. Flowers are 1/4-3/8″ across consisting of five sepals partially fused at the base of the flower; five white petals, green at their base, sometimes with purple highlights on the outside of the petal, and usually curved backwards; five anthers and their thick filaments appressed to form a tight, bright yellow cylinder with a yellowish-green stem; and a slender style running up the center of the appressed anthers to just emerge from the tip as a green stigma. The fruit is a 1/4-3/8″ tomato-like berry, initially green; mature berries are black. The foliage and unripe fruit contain the alkaloid solanum and are toxic. Leaves and flowers of black nightshade are similar to those of horsenettle (
S. carolinense), but black nightshade lacks the large, sharp spines and bristles of the latter. Bittersweet nightshade (
S. dulcamara) is also similar to black nightshade but has red (rather than black) mature fruit, purple (not white) petals on the flowers, and three-lobed leaves without wings on the petioles. A recent paper in Nature (2024; vol. 386, p. 1366-1372) shows that the steroidal saponins present in black nightshade (and presumably other
Solanum sp.) protect the plant from attack by a variety of herbivorous insects. Note:
USDA Plants calls this species
Solanum ptycanthum (dropping the “h”).
Flora of North America claims the valid name for this species is
Solanum emulans.
ITIS accepts the spelling given here and deems it a valid species. The question of which of these sources is right is beyond my pay grade.